Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 03 21:48:09 EDT 2002 | fastek
I judge a country's technology level by what they buy and what China is buying are not MSR's and CP-7's. It's MV2's, MV2C's, CP-4's with an MV2F here and there. If that's not behind the curve, I don't know what is. I would say they are 5 years behind
Electronics Forum | Tue May 11 01:18:35 EDT 2004 | fastek
Grant- Just so happens I was offered an almost new one today. Check them out and if a CP7 is indeed what you decide to get let me know and I'll likely be able to save you some money off of new. Rick fastek@comcast.net
Electronics Forum | Tue May 25 18:12:14 EDT 2004 | gregp
I can't offer a recommendation but I have a question. Doing the math (4 x 430 parts = 1720 parts, 13 minute load time) I calculate 7938 cph. With mostly 0603 components why can't the Hydra head come closer to the claimed 21,000 cph rate? Am I miss
Electronics Forum | Wed May 26 11:56:56 EDT 2004 | fastek
Enough said? Perhaps. One other question...how committed to SMT equipment is Hitachi? Big company...lots of irons in the fire. Willing to put up with a division with eroding sales (especially in the US)? I suppose Hitachi will continue to use UIC to
Electronics Forum | Sun Jun 13 13:50:19 EDT 2004 | cyber_wolf
Actually, Fuji machine corp. was founded on chip cutting machines.(Metal cutting machines) Fuji incorporated what they knew from this industry in the design of their circuit board assembly machines. I come from a long line of mechanical design engin
Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 09 13:17:30 EDT 2004 | vickt
Sam.. Consider that the majority of NA and Euro electronics assembly is primarily higher mix, lower volume. Space is tight (and expensive) at tradeshows, so manufactures tend to bring what the local markets require. Like it or not...Other than a
Electronics Forum | Sun Apr 03 20:10:06 EDT 2005 | smtuser1234
You better get to know who the third party service companies are because Fuji just does not care about service they rely on their reputation. If you wanted good service you should have gone with Universal. When you compare machines now days all of th
Electronics Forum | Sat Jul 24 04:02:18 EDT 2004 | kent_peterson
Two ways at it.You could just put the same nozzle for both the min and max.Or you could move the feeder into a location that has similar parts using the nozzle you want. With the feeder setup it should be optimized for the least amount of nozzle ch
Electronics Forum | Sat Jul 24 04:02:21 EDT 2004 | kent_peterson
Two ways at it.You could just put the same nozzle for both the min and max.Or you could move the feeder into a location that has similar parts using the nozzle you want. With the feeder setup it should be optimized for the least amount of nozzle ch
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 12 14:25:49 EDT 2007 | Grant
Hi, From what I can tell the guys who still use these CP8 machines are in China, where they run incredibly complex stuff all day, and don't change over as much. Doing computer motherboards etc. I visited some of the factories, and they had over 20 l
